lundi 16 février 2015

Why do dekstop environments make custom xdg-open replacements?


Related to this answer on my previous question.


So, XDG can handle it on its own:



  • It can manage default applications - xdg-mime

  • It can open file with associated application - xdg-open.


Why do desktop environments make their own replacements for xdg-open? Like gvfs-open, kde-open, or exo-open,...


Isn't xdg-open enough? If not, what does it lack?



Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire